Is Blood Thicker Than Balderdash?

-


 
After alienating Kevin Randle over a Dream Team controversy involving rumors of photographic slides showing an otherworldly being, the irked Paul Kimball stirred a dust-up with his uncle, physicist/ufology researcher/"Roswell-was-an-ET-crash" proponent Stan Friedman.

 Please note that both Stan and Paul are citizens of The Great White North but their respective essays lay myth to the concept of a “gray Canadian.”

 In his essay entitled “Paul Kimball's UFO Debunking and Irrationality" Stan responded to a essay by his nephew that challenged him on a number of points.  Paul even referred to Stan's concept of nuclear-powered rockets as interstellar spacecraft as "balderdash."  Youch!  

 (Paul’s essay, “The Illogic of the Crashed ET Spacecraft Myth,” can be read here.)

 The main theme of Stan’s essay is how educated and intelligent people can act so irrational when it comes to debunking certain ufological beliefs.  After citing a dubious debunking statement by science fiction writer Isaac Asimov, Stan mentions his nephew’s law degree, indicating Paul is of above average intelligence, and how Paul has studied UFOs.  But then Stan illustrates how Paul’s intelligence fails on the topic of crashed alien spacecraft 

 Regarding Roswell Paul asked why would any alien spacecraft crash on this planet if the ETs had such superior technology?

 Stan countered that a craft designed to travel in a planetary atmosphere wouldn’t have the same durability as the mothership that brought it here.  He gave the example of an aircraft carrier being akin to a mothership while the more fragile airplanes launched from it would be like what crashed at Roswell.

 Paul also repeated the skeptic’s take on the A-Flying-Saucer-Really-Crashed-Near-Roswell belief, how the details couldn’t remain covered up for so long since the 1947 incident.  Someone would have leaked the fantastic truth by now.

 Stan countered with examples such as the Manhattan Project that employed 60,000 people who were able to keep tight-lipped and didn't sink any ships.

 Responding to his nephew’s snark re: ““Stan Friedman’s nuclear rockets balderdash” the peeved uncle wrote: “Why Paul is in denial about nuclear rockets I don’t know, though I suppose lawyers don’t dig into such matters.”  Stan added that one of his books has photos of real nuclear-powered rockets.

 Years ago Stan spoke at a local college here in Plattsburgh, NY.  After his presentation a smart-ass student from the college radio station – a David-Letterman-wannabe – interviewed Stan, making all sorts of jokes such as references to alien abductions and anal probes.  To his credit Stan remained unflappable, didn’t take the bait, but calmly responded to each inane question. 

 But with his response to his nephew’s criticism Stan allowed himself to be a bit testy.  Of course family does make it more personal.

 While I don't agree with all of his views Stan does raise one good point in his essay.  He refers to an either/or statement attributed to writer Isaac Asimov.

 While Isaac was known for being imaginative with his fiction he took the skeptical high road with his non-fiction works, particularly on the topic of UFOs.  He observed one time that if aliens were visiting this planet they would either remain hidden or reveal themselves to mankind.

 As if there is no middle ground between those extremes.

 In both science and fiction there are shades of gray.

Parting note: On the topic of nuclear spacecraft there’s this article with links at Techdirt.com: “DailyDirt: Nuclear Power In Space.”

Comments

Paul Kimball said…
One of the more common refrains of the "cosmic watergate" crowd is that secrets can indeed be kept, after which they usually trot out the Manhattan Project as an example (Stan Friedman does this all the time). Here's the problem - they either don't know their history, or they do know their history but are hoping their audience doesn't. The truth is that secrecy on the Manhattan Project (which only lasted for a few years - not the 65+ that would be required for Roswell) was breached fairly early on, and more than once - google the following names: Klaus Fuchs (pictured above), Harry Gold, David Greenglass, Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, George Koval and Theodore Hall. Alas, those are names that the cosmic watergate crowd would rather not tell you about because they are inconvenient facts that get in the way of the impossibly implausible narrative they want to sell you.
4:28 AM
Doug said…
It's impossible for me to see you use "alienating" in your opening line and see it as coincidence. But don't tell me the truth; I prefer my conspiracy.
3:05 PM
X. Dell said…
I've always said that a good debunker is worth her weight in plutonium.

I see what you mean here. I don't really take Friedman all that seriously, but his point about debunkers is well taken, and in fact probably do more to drive irrational beliefs than clarify issues. If one debunks well, they address the issues raise, at least make an effort to abstain from glibness, and explain why, when they weigh their evidence, the exotic explanation comes up wanting. Instead, many rely on comfortable assumptions that lay unexamined.

12:39 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

-
Image
Jim Moseley: Flying Saucer Farewell I'll miss my late night phone conversations with Jim Moseley. Despite trying to track how he was doing in his fight against cancer I didn't hear the bad news until yesterday. Jim died on November 16, 2012. One of my regrets that I never had the opportunity to visit him in Key West and spend a day with him. Even though we never met in person, he was a friend. I mainly knew Jim as a voice on the phone -- and, of course, as the writer-editor of the zine Saucer Smear (and also as the author of postcards he sent to me marked PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL). Jim was around at the dawn of ufology -- or as the topic was called way back then, flying saucers. Parts of the field he couldn't accept, personalities way out there without anything real to back them up. For example, George Adamski. Jim was critical of "ufoology." Through his writings Jim made friends and enemies. His humor and tell-it-like-it-is attitude didn...
Read more
-
Image
Jesus Photo Jesus Christ died in 33 CE. French physicist Joseph Nicephore Niepce created the first known permanent photograph on metal in 1826 CE. Ergo, there are no photos of the living Jesus. But not when it comes to supernaturalism, especially of the New Age kind. After reading the non-fiction work When Prophecy Fails , I wanted to find out more about the people described in the book. Their names had been changed but with some Googling I discovered that the actual appellation of “Mrs. Marion Keech,” the leader of the doomsday flying saucer cult in the 1950s, was Dorothy Martin. After her prophecies failed in Chicago, Dorothy Martin moved on but kept channeling Jesus Christ – or the being whose real name, she believed, was Sananda. She ended up in South America, living in the Yucatan, with a new name: Sister Thedra. Jesus (AKA the Ascended Master Sananda) appeared to Thedra and cured her of terminal cancer. To prove that she hadn’t been dreaming, Jesus appeared in tangible form ...
Read more
-
Image
But It Probably Wasn't The Ghost Of An Angry Santa So what was banging away at night on the roof where Steve Volk lived when he was young? Was a ghost terrifying his family, trying to hack its way it, the same entity that yanked the covers off the beds of his sisters? I don't know. Volk describes the incident in his non-fiction book, FRINGE-OLOGY: How I Tried To Explain Away the Unexplainable —And Couldn't . As a reporter he couldn't write the typical joke article that laughed off the supernatural as the crazy delusions of fringe types. While tagging along with ghost-hunters, he could see that while many cases had earthly explanations, there were a few incidents that couldn't be dismissed so easily. Unlike hard-core skeptics who create scientific justifications to dispel any paranormal ideas, Volk thinks some things are simply unexplainable. Volk says that the supernatural and the paranormal are not the same. The supernatural is “of or relating to an order of ex...
Read more